A small, long-established food company under the well-known Pran name that pays a dependable 32% cash dividend every year — but its profit has drifted slightly lower even as sales kept rising, and it still owes more than its own money.
Agricultural Marketing Company (Pran) is a small, long-listed food business that has paid the same 32% cash dividend for years and reliably generates cash — the kind of quiet, income-style holding that suits patient investors who prize a steady payout over fast growth. The trade-off is modest: profit has been flat to slightly lower for five years while borrowings still sit a little above its own capital, so it is a slow-and-steady name rather than a growth story. Whether today's price makes it a good buy is shown separately in the live value estimate beside this report.
Value today
Around fair valueToday
৳233
Rough estimate
৳200
Based on its own past price levels, what similar companies trade at, the value of what it owns and the dividend it pays. · low confidence
- Its own usual price vs profit৳221
- Priced like similar companies (profit)৳229
- Its own usual price vs asset value৳250
- Based on the dividend it pays৳53.3
A rough, educational estimate from the figures we have — not a price target or advice.
Data as of 2026-07-22
What does this company do?
A small food-and-allied company carrying the well-known Pran name, listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange since 1996.
Agricultural Marketing Company Ltd. sits in the food and allied part of the market and carries the widely recognised Pran name. It has been a listed company on the Dhaka Stock Exchange since 1996 — about 30 years on the market — so it is a long-established, seasoned business rather than a newcomer.
By stock-market size it is small. The company has only about 0.8 crore shares in total (80 lakh shares), each with a face value of 10 taka, and paid-up capital of just 8 crore taka. Over years of trading, though, it has built up reserves of about 62.3 crore taka — far larger than that paid-up capital — which shows it has kept a good deal of past profit inside the business.
In terms of business volume it is bigger than its tiny share count suggests: yearly sales grew from about 294.9 crore taka in 2021 to about 330.6 crore taka in 2024. So this is a company that moves a fair amount of product each year, even though the number of shares in issue is very small.
How does it make money?
It earns by selling food and allied products — moving a large volume of sales, of which only a thin slice becomes profit.
The company's income comes from selling food and allied products, operating under the Pran umbrella. The fact pack does not spell out its exact product lines, but the shape of its numbers tells the story: it runs on high sales volume and thin margins — a lot of money passes through, and only a small part of it stays behind as profit.
You can see this clearly in the gap between sales and profit. In 2024, sales were about 330.6 crore taka, but the operating profit — what is left after the day-to-day costs of running the business — was only about 8.46 crore taka, and the final net profit was about 4.41 crore taka. In other words, only a small slice of each taka of sales becomes profit, which is typical of a food-and-distribution business where costs run high.
Sales have climbed steadily — about 294.9 crore taka in 2021, 315.4 crore in 2022, 322.6 crore in 2023 and 330.6 crore in 2024 — which points to steady demand for its products. The real challenge is turning that rising volume into rising profit, and so far the company has not managed it.
Is it actually making money?
Yes — it is profitable every year, but profit has stayed flat to slightly lower for five years even as sales rose.
The company has made a profit in every one of the last five years, so it is genuinely and consistently profitable. But the profit has not grown. Net profit was about 4.3 crore taka in 2021, edged up to about 4.49 crore in 2022, then settled at about 4.33 crore (2023), 4.41 crore (2024) and 4.01 crore in 2025. Across the whole 2021-to-2025 stretch, profit is down about 7%. Profit per share tells the same story — 5.37 taka, 5.62 taka, 5.42 taka, 5.51 taka and 5.01 taka — bumpy and slightly lower at the end.
The puzzle is that sales rose while profit did not. From 2021 to 2024, sales climbed from about 294.9 to 330.6 crore taka, but operating profit barely moved, staying around 8 to 9 crore taka each year. That means rising costs — including interest on its borrowings — ate up the extra sales. In 2024 the operating profit was about 8.46 crore taka but net profit was only about 4.41 crore; much of that difference is interest paid on debt.
On the encouraging side, the business turns its profit into real cash. Operating cash flow was healthy at about 17.0, 15.7 and 19.5 crore taka in 2021, 2022 and 2023 — comfortably more than reported profit — though it dipped to about 9.79 crore in 2024. The most recent nine-month update (July 2025 to March 2026) reported profit per share of 4.74 taka, a touch below 4.93 taka a year earlier, in line with the flat-to-soft trend.
Is it financially safe?
Reasonably stable and cash-generative, but it still owes more than its own capital and keeps very little spare cash.
The clearest caution is debt. The company has owed more than its shareholders' own money for years — its debt was around 119 to 125 crore taka over 2021 to 2023, against equity (the shareholders' own money in the business) of only about 67 to 71 crore taka. The good news is that it cut debt sharply in 2024, down to about 79.0 crore taka, so the ratio of debt to its own money improved from about 1.8 times to roughly 1.1 times. It still owes a little more than it owns, but the direction is right.
Carrying debt has a cost: interest payments are a big reason the roughly 8 to 9 crore taka of operating profit shrinks to only about 4 crore taka of net profit each year. Cash in hand is also thin — only about 1.82 crore taka at the end of 2024, down from about 3.75 crore in 2021 — so there is not a large rainy-day cushion. Set against that, the company generates positive operating cash flow every year, and the asset value backing each share (its net asset value) has risen steadily, from 84.17 taka in 2021 to 92.88 taka in 2025.
On the outside view, the credit-rating agency CRISL gave the company a long-term rating of AA- with a Stable outlook in December 2025, which points to reasonable financial standing. One thing to note: the auditor added an "Emphasis of Matter" paragraph to the accounts for the year ended June 2025 — not necessarily a problem, but a flag worth reading in the full report before deciding.
How do we judge if it's fairly priced?
We compare the price against four yardsticks — its own past pricing, similar companies, the value of what it owns, and its dividend; the live box beside this report does the current math.
We do not put a price call in this write-up. The price moves every day, so a live value-today box beside this report does that job, and any price-based figure would go stale the moment the market moves. What stays useful is understanding the method and the durable inputs.
Four common-sense yardsticks are used. First, the company's own history: how the share has usually been priced against its yearly profit in the past, compared with where it sits now. Second, similar companies: what other food-sector businesses cost relative to their profit. Third, the value of what it owns: the assets backing each share (its net asset value) were about 92.88 taka per share in 2025, and the price is measured against that. Fourth, the dividend: how much income the 3.2-taka-per-share cash dividend represents for a buyer.
The durable anchors that feed those yardsticks are the ones you can rely on from the accounts — profit per share of about 5.01 taka in 2025, net asset value of about 92.88 taka per share, and a 3.2-taka cash dividend. How today's price sits against each of those — and whether that reads as cheap, fair or expensive right now — is shown live beside this report, not fixed into this text.
Value today
Around fair valueToday
৳233
Rough estimate
৳200
Based on its own past price levels, what similar companies trade at, the value of what it owns and the dividend it pays. · low confidence
- Its own usual price vs profit৳221
- Priced like similar companies (profit)৳229
- Its own usual price vs asset value৳250
- Based on the dividend it pays৳53.3
A rough, educational estimate from the figures we have — not a price target or advice.
Does it reward shareholders?
Yes — a rock-steady 32% cash dividend (3.2 taka a share) every year for five years, using a bit under two-thirds of profit.
This is the company's strongest calling card. It has paid a 32% cash dividend — that is 32% of the 10-taka face value, or 3.2 taka per share — in every one of the last five years, from 2021 through 2025, with no gaps and no cuts. It has not paid stock dividends (bonus shares); the reward comes purely as cash, which income-focused investors usually prefer.
The payout also looks affordable. With profit per share of about 5.01 taka in 2025 and a dividend of 3.2 taka, the company hands out roughly 60% of its yearly profit and keeps the rest inside the business. That leaves a cushion — the dividend is not stretched to the limit — which is part of why it has been able to keep the payout unchanged year after year even though profit has been flat.
A note of realism: because profit has drifted slightly lower, the room above the dividend has narrowed a little over time. The payout still looks comfortable, but a further fall in profit is the main thing to watch for anyone relying on that steady dividend.
What makes it special?
Its edge is the recognisable Pran name and a long, dependable track record — but it is small and lower-return next to the sector's big branded players.
The company's main advantage is intangible but real: it trades under the well-known Pran name in the food and allied sector, and it has a long, steady record — profitable every year and a dividend paid without fail. Sponsors and directors own about 40.15% of the shares, so the people running it have a large personal stake alongside outside shareholders, which tends to keep management's interests aligned with investors'.
Set against its peers, though, it is a small, lower-return player. Its profit has drifted down about 7% over five years, while several food-sector peers in the fact pack — such as Olympic Industries, Lovello and Unilever Consumer Care — grew their latest-year earnings. It also earns only a small return on its shareholders' money: about 4.41 crore taka of net profit in 2024 against about 72.7 crore taka of equity. The big branded names do far better, with Unilever Consumer Care earning a return of about 27% and Olympic Industries about 17% on their shareholders' money.
So the honest read is a modest edge: a trusted name and a loyal, long-standing business, but not the kind of dominant brand strength or fat margins that let a company raise prices freely. Its edge is dependability, not dominance.
Why it could do well
A dependable dividend, genuine profit and cash generation, falling debt, a committed sponsor owner, and a trusted name.
- A dependable dividend. A 32% cash dividend (3.2 taka a share) paid every year for five straight years, using only about 60% of profit — a reliable income stream with a cushion left over.
- Genuinely profitable and cash-generative. A profit in every one of the last five years, and operating cash flow that comfortably exceeds reported profit in most years — the earnings are backed by real cash.
- Debt coming down. Borrowings fell from about 123 crore taka to about 79 crore in 2024, cutting the debt-to-own-money ratio from about 1.8 to 1.1 — a healthier balance sheet than a few years ago.
- A strongly aligned owner. Sponsors and directors hold about 40.15% of the shares, so management has a big personal stake in the outcome.
- A trusted name and long record. About 30 years listed, under the recognisable Pran name, with net asset value per share rising steadily from 84.17 taka in 2021 to 92.88 taka in 2025.
What could go wrong
Flat-to-falling profit, debt still above its own capital, a thin cash cushion, governance flags, and small size with low returns.
- Flat-to-falling profit. Net profit and profit per share are down about 7% over 2021 to 2025, and rising sales have not turned into rising profit — the core worry.
- Still owes more than it owns. Even after cutting debt, it owes a little more than its own capital (debt-to-own-money around 1.1 times), and interest costs roughly halve its operating profit each year.
- A thin cash cushion. Cash in hand fell to about 1.82 crore taka by 2024 — little buffer if a bad year hits.
- Governance and compliance flags. The auditor added an "Emphasis of Matter" note to the June-2025 accounts, and in early 2026 a delay in paying the approved dividend on time briefly triggered a warning that the share could be moved to a lower trading category (later resolved after the company filed the required papers) — reminders to watch governance.
- Small and lower-return. It is a small company with thin margins that lags bigger branded food peers on both growth and return on shareholders' money, so it has limited pricing power.
So, is it for you?
Best suited to patient, income-minded investors who value a steady dividend over growth — with flat profit and debt as the main caveats.
Agricultural Marketing Company (Pran) is a slow-and-steady, income-style holding. Its appeal is dependability: a profit every year, a 32% cash dividend paid without fail for five years, real cash generation, and a recognisable name behind it. That makes it most suitable for patient investors who want a regular dividend and can accept modest, unexciting growth.
It is less suitable for someone chasing fast growth or big capital gains. Profit has been flat to slightly lower for five years, margins are thin, and it still carries a little more debt than its own capital — so it is unlikely to shoot ahead quickly, and a further drop in profit would be the main thing that could pressure even its steady dividend.
In short: a dependable, dividend-first name for the cautious, long-term saver, not a growth pick. Everything price-related — whether today's price is cheap, fair or expensive, and the current buy or sell signal — is shown live beside this report and is deliberately left out of this durable write-up, so check that before deciding.
This is educational information, not investment advice. Do your own research or consult a licensed adviser before making any investment decision.